A Christian Atheist response to the #Brady scandal

[Image source: BBC]
The Catholic Primate of all Ireland, Cardinal Sean Brady, is in some very hot water, and like the proverbial frog in a saucepan, claims he is quite happy as the gas is turned up and the water starts to boil. It turns out that his role in the Catholic Church's cover-up of clerical paedophilia was substantially greater than he has previously intimated, and he had the opportunity to save children from abuse, but failed to do so. "Just following orders" is as close as we got to an explanation of his position.

This has prompted a huge wave of outrage in Ireland, much of it (rightly) directed towards the Catholic Church itself, whose archaic procedures left it effectively legally and morally rudderless, where defence of the Church itself was seen as more important than the protection of little children. Jesus himself had something to say about that, but I don't see the Vatican or the Irish Church hierarchy queuing up to be fitted for their millstones.

But as Christian Atheists, whether Catholic, Protestant or other, what should we take from this sordid affair?

My own view is that we need to learn the lessons - no organisation or structure has the right to decide for itself to deal with criminal matters purely through its own procedures. People collusive in such procedures - which effectively amount to conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - need to examine their consciences, and offer their resignations, even if only to show some degree of contrition. Children need to be protected at all times.

Although writing from an unashamedly Atheist position, I do not feel that religion per se is the great social evil that some Atheists make it out to be. The evil is unchallengeable belief. The arrogance that will see Brady fall (inevitably) derives from an unshakeable belief in his own superiority, and a view that the church can do no wrong. The complete absence of humility is staggering in its extent, but perhaps not surprising, given the attitude of the Roman Catholic Church to those who break ranks (Father Brian D'Arcy being the most prominent and commendable example).

Should Christians leave the Catholic Church for a different church? I can't say. But Christian Atheists should at least make their voice heard on this and other issues. We do not lack a moral compass, as some detractors would imply. On the contrary, we base our dealings with our fellow humans on that Great Commandment (a short sharp Humanist manifesto if ever there was one) to love our neighbour as ourselves. The irony is that the priest and Levite in the parable of the Good Samaritan were obeying their religious orders not to touch a wounded person. Yet in following orders, in putting their religious structures and procedures above the act of helping a fellow human being in dire distress, we quite rightly regard them as ghastly hypocrites. And so we should regard Brady. And indeed, so we should regard ourselves when we look back over our lives at the times when we have just followed orders, and left someone to suffer.

Sometimes the best way to show leadership is to resign. In clinging to the ever-more sweaty and sordid reins of power, Brady is putting himself above the victims of his own inexcusable inaction.

3 comments:

  1. Your best post EVER! imao.... Balanced. No argument at all with the points made. (Shock, horror!)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Slicer! Glad we agree on something :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. As you pointed out this cover was just business as usual or effectively the policy of the church with approval at the very top - namely the pope.

    I wonder if you have read the book by David Yallop titled The Power and the Glory - The Dark Heart of John Paul II's Vatican. A book which describes in great detail how the vatican is absolutely rotten to the core. And how JPII and Ratzinger helped to consolidate the rottenness.

    And Ratzinger has the hide to prattle on about the rot of relativism. I wonder what he really sees when he looks in the mirror?

    But then again everything described in that book was/is just business as usual - it has been standard practice for forever and a day.
    See for instance The Criminal History of the Papacy by Tony Bushby, parts of which are available online.

    ReplyDelete

Please leave a comment - not rude or off-topic. I have allowed anonymous postings for now, but if it gets a bit mad, I might need to change that. I reserve the right to delete comments if the thread is getting a wee bit out of hand - sorry for that. However, ideas welcome!